Data Managers’ Perspectives on Designated Communities and FAIR Principles

Poster presented at Drexel-CODATA FAIR-RRDM Workshop, Philadelphia, PA https://conference.codata.org/Drexel_CODATA_2019/posters/This poster presents preliminary findings of the study on data managers’ perspectives on changes in the Designated Community, related evolution of support services provided by the repository, and the FAIR Principles. The study examines the case of the Petroleum Database Management System (PDMS) hosted by the Indiana Geological and Water Survey (IGWS), a research institute of Indiana University.IMLS grant RE-02-14-0023 “Integrated doctoral education with application to scholarly communication

Scholarly Needs for Text Analysis Resources: A User Assessment Study for the HathiTrust Research Center

The HathiTrust Research Center (HTRC) is undertaking a study to better understand the needs of current and potential users of the center’s tools and services for computational text analysis. In this paper, we report on the results of the first phase of the study, which consisted of interviews with scholars, administrators, and librarians whose work involves text data mining. Our study reveals that text analysis workflows are specific to the individual research project and are often nonlinear. In spite of, and in some cases because of, the wealth of textual data available, scholars find it most difficult to locate, access, and curate textual data for their research. While the goals of the study directly relate to research and development for the HTRC, our results are useful for other large-scale data providers developing solutions for allowing computational access to their content

Linking research infrastructure and funding to scholarly output in astronomy

Poster, Force11 conference https://www.force11.org/entityform/11

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 67 countries

Scientific information is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in science can help decision-makers act based on the best available evidence, especially during crises such as climate change or the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. Here we interrogated these concerns with a pre-registered 67-country survey of 71,417 respondents on all inhabited continents and find that in most countries, a majority of the public trust scientists and think that scientists should be more engaged in policymaking. We further show that there is a discrepancy between the public’s perceived and desired priorities of scientific research. Moreover, we find variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual-and country-level variables,including political orientation. While these results do not show widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 67 countries

Scientific information is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in science can help decision-makers act based on the best available evidence, especially during crises such as climate change or the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. Here we interrogated these concerns with a pre-registered 67-country survey of 71,417 respondents on all inhabited continents and find that in most countries, a majority of the public trust scientists and think that scientists should be more engaged in policymaking. We further show that there is a discrepancy between the public’s perceived and desired priorities of scientific research. Moreover, we find variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual-and country-level variables,including political orientation. While these results do not show widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists